The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.  

Confession: No pun intended.

 In regards to the Tetrahedron of Everything, I may need to give credit to Ken Wilber.  While I was not aware of it at the time, and I had recovered it base on earlier work of mine(i.e. a reading of Plato’s Republic), I may need to give him credit for it.  Even to the point of unconsciously stealing it lock, stock and barrel.  Alternatively it is a case of synchronicity* but it turns out, he had a late night radio program from 1973 to 1982 about such “new age” matters.  This coincides with a period I worked mostly graveyard shifts and had access to a radio.  I recovered this not only through Plato other fields of study.  Only thanks to a  question to Meta AI did I discover that he had the same disciplines on the vertices of the tetrahedron.  They are Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.  HOWEVER: while this has not been run through AI even for cleanup, in a quick search I could not find the sources for what AI had given me on another device.    

A more comprehensive search (who came up with the Tetrahedron of Everything Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.) does not find what I have on my other device either.  But it does remind me to credit Buckminster Fuller who I saw speak at our high school in the early 70’s. Then there is Milo Wolfe who I can not place on the timeline of this process.  More credit to be processed.

https://youtu.be/bc5V_YXvGC8   This has not been viewed yet, but shows four people I have studied.  Three of them in one class.  “Marx, Nietzsche, Freud” and Einstein an early publication.  Sometime in the early 70’s I read the book, Man and his Symbols by Joseph Campbell, with a forward by Carl Jung.

* Update: I have found that Wilbur had not mentioned it until his book in 1995. Which I did not read or have.

5-9-26  However Arthur Youg mentioned a Tetrahedron of Will in 1976>

UPDATE

 I made a note on the first post and hope to carry on later.  
It is noted in the dated update in the last post .

TheLiaisonReport.net: meta-field (political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com)

Of(or) re-con4th[!]

Then there is my experience in several aspects of hospitality and structural recreation.
Pardon the conflation of fields, but I leave aside the early years in the hotels and restaurants and bookkeeping.  I refer to exporting building* materials, building a home and maintaining an apartment building, let alone meta-4s.

* not yet read more than a paragraph of so

"Juridical Positivism"

Bookmarks in Progress.

(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper

** ~ (*)  obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory )  ~Mobius asterisk*

Meanwhile.

[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^

*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]

^tetrahedron of history or teachers

[[Lacanian Leap?]]

New Meta Theory

The anthropomorphism of systems.**

Have your ad hominem and eat it too.

[The Digger You Deep?]*

*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.

[** + * =  Quantum Sovereignty ]

Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology? 
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]] 
Now that may be the ticket!!!  Knot?^  The faith ~ science nexus.

{{Rough ramble:  3 dimensions are?  4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*

Clown Car A or B?

Or C ? 

Bane or Change?

Don't call them stupid!
It only adds to their lip schtick!
aka Akin to Jindal. 
let alone books Scarlet Badge of Ivanhoe or cam a lot?

We need a poll asking which clown car are you for?
Obama Clinton Warren Sanders or Bush, McCain, Romney, Palin, Paul, Walker et al?
Camel under tent and circling your cats, and the spectral meta~for! (or lemma-4)
Still / ~ / going. 

[Daily KOS]

5-27-15 The Try Angle File. (NFRY label)
5-28-15 Not so circular file.  Nor Try Angle [!]
[Thomas Roberts: Bush/Rubio~Putin]
Let alone NOW w/ Chimp See, Chimp sue? Let alone LIBtard HeGel?

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Meta-Flack

Nitty Piketty [!]
Or nickety snickers? (spectators)

[Mezzo flack ?  The dOW? 5 6 7 8 ]

( scroll / click ? ) (:~:)
[fb /   y-t]
p-o-b...
c-b- 




ow ?

Hump Day?

To Re:view Page:
Original intent to retrace the War on Hillary[!] links.
Under RE:VIEWING we find: File for Facebook.(but that is a tangent)
So back to 12-2-14.  We find Culture*. Below that we find OW [!]
Then (FP1) parses the Greek. Under which I find a new anamoly.** [A Witt gen stein?]
Within FP! we have (FP2)
Under post-pyth we have more on Hillary.  Prior threads and Pythagorean work on the way.
That's the ticket. C. bad+press Other Greeks*** to Countdown. or un-Vienna Circle?
The Calculus of DOW or coneheads? (Jung, Euclid, Barlow), (Newton Liebniz Asimov), Dar Tan Ya?

But back to the parsing or back from the tangent.
~~~~
(FP1)
~~~~
 (Liebniz Dar Ching)
There is no plausible metaphilosophy. All is metaphysics. 
Wittgenstein/NewLieb/TOW: words, math, subjective  /* objective Larouche / Rand?

Manual Blog Search: Not Just ... a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Gitmo or less. ,
 Reading In Progress[***], Full Read! ?,  Hume or boo , F'N 3
[Need to review labeling of photos, images, cartoons etc]

Is the rational, math or language? 
Is subjective/objective the real ManyKey'nIsm or classical economics?
C-Shelley ? Or pre- stein.

*asterisk in original (* R.I.P.)
** leave as anamoly of [scroll over unclickable]
***  need to adjust way point(that's the ticket)

(FN!) : Starting with the last insert.(*-5) = mics? in regards to the meta-plausible.
(*-9)@ ManyKey'nIsm we (b.s.)Tryunism for 3 links in 2 posts.
A bit more anachronistic(*-1) we are Frank 'n pre-cast[!] 'n loosing the thread with C-Shelley ?
Or Shilling Schiller [!] 

Four Models(~):

 

(~) models : Milo Mulligan / The message is the mess.  (~) Para-model

Penta-meta point ?
Geo-metrics [!] ? (~)





 /*  : (2-4-14) [ / ]=subjective+objective:(b.s.) link inserted also two selected from(fp3)

Not Just ...

a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Nor War'n Tester ?



Tetra-heed-run



(fn1)/(f'n p)(fp3)
(meta 4: Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again , D&R Tan ya?)

(blog anomaly: improper spacing/seamingly adjusted[!])


[Thales] [?]



Pen

tag on all ? [!]

meta gone ski ?

[!] my first reaction to last night was, the public needed a reminder !
Label Reminder: NFRY = (not fully read yet)

PIT Spot?

Meta-cystical point or so duh?


Not to pump the mess anger or dis-road improvements. 


i.e. change of(4) course


At this point, I will refrain from inserting links to confound or unfuse the above.
My O.I. is in the Lab3ls [!]


A.  NFRY
B.  Meta-slash
C.  Ribble
4.  P.C.




RSN: Smallest Font- Unread, Normal Font- Read, Small Font (or bold)- of special interest
Nicholas Kristof New York Times, Agence France-Presse,  David Remnick, The New Yorker, Jason Rosenbaum, National Public Radio, (...under construction)   Frank Rich, New York Magazine
TO: (...Under Construction)   .Yana Kunichoff, Truthout | Interview..


Spoiler alert?  The Last Word, Howard Dean ? IBT: wps 

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Foo Wrappers

Hedges,
Giroux,
PC, ID ?
MetaPhysical
Alt Fray

Marco Pole Oh

Meta 4 Falls

Insert Yosemite ...
M - beds ?


[Re:The Cycle* 'n The**Last**Word]

* to insert
** papal bull(respectfully!)

999?
The Daily Rundown?

Anachronism

1-21-14 (no text) (saved in doc)
1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14

Pop Four?

Randi Rhodes:  Defender and Explainer of Obamanomics?
Norman Goldman:  Radical Middle?
Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin

The Poverty of Popperism, **

The Less Than Pentagonal File

A mature Log [.]

4 word [.]
 

Meta More Phosis?
Not Exactly!
 

==============================================

Randi Rhodes

No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet.  i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.

Further ow[!]

parallels-meet-religion-and-nationalism-in-the-early
when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html

1-22-14

 * Nor less regard for Thom(:) Hartmann or Rachel(:) Maddow:

Time is a funny thing.  The fourth dimension?  What about perpendicular to the 3?  But then there is the parallel of not having time to follow every tangent let alone parallels. 

**1-23-14   links titled and morphed, lines 4 and 6 added. Link(or line)5 actually read or rubric's fit ?

 

IGOPOGO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[.] = lame punctuashuns[!]
i.e. prologue / foreword (^)
 

(:) more to insert and POGO [!] ~[foot note]
 

(*) the sequal? WaPo Slate?

(^)1-24-14  i.e. prologue / foreword
Also 4 links added for 4 original personalities.(Andrea Mitchell /

Not to bury but...

Owe but I did. 

Knot to mention di-Spencered with.*

Con Text
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/david-vitter-alan-grayson-bills-101965.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins385842.html

Meta-4's
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/busted_10_myths_that_reveal_just_how_dangerous_the_nsa_really_is_partner/?source=newsletter **
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/paul_krugman_republicans_are_enemies_of_americas_poor/?source=newsletter

http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/no_christies_scandal_is_not_like_benghazi_why_the_rights_defense_is_doomed/?source=newsletter
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/chris_christies_forgiving_fan_club_why_elite_centrists_will_back_him_all_the_way/?source=newsletter

Salt Lick?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borate
http://inogolo.com/audio/Wittgenstein_4139.mp3


* Having browsed the busted myth and read the Krugman, and contexted the mess, I accidently deleted, so the above is a revamp(Or V-ramp) of sorts, to reprocess later. 

** I may have mitt-flopped the original Salon selections, Akin to progress and chem mystery.

Footnote***--- me: "I like the context you put it in". kNot said yet.  

*** alternet point of deparcher[!]{!}

Parallel Fields. ? (Re: Con Text i.e. GOTO Hegel?)

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/21113-disimagination-machines-and-punishing-factories-in-the-age-of-casino-capitalism
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21197-noam-chomsky-on-the-legacy-of-ariel-sharon-not-speaking-ill-of-the-dead-imposes-a-vow-of-silence
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21198-fifty-years-later-the-war-on-poverty-working-better-than-the-right-or-left-will-admit
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21199-turkey-in-crisis-understanding-the-erdogan-gulen-split

These I have barely dug into.  And I have left the paddle ING to you.

S-word of Damocles

The Last Word?*
Jared Bernstein: The Sequester. 
Un-Meta Glom ?
The Warren Wing?
Justice Leon

Re: Right Mindwringing?
Not.

[*The Sequester has been partially alleviated...
Italics & Note and links  to The Last Word inserted 12-18-13]

Note:  There must be a genre for analogue evolution [!] Might be under the rubric of Hegelian objectivism[!] Or Manichean Subjectivism ?   The Vote is the Sword.  The Sequester is the S-Word.
Re: HA?[!]

[x, y, z ? (ow)]

Perspectivism

On Obama[!]
Lede or other shi#?

1. Meta PI*
2. (b.s.) turd+blossom**
3. (b.s.) lede or ineffable

Not that it worked out by intention, but "#/other/lede" are the order of inserted links.

(FP1)need update and reference to {L} to consider order of insert later
*gno pun intended nor post intelligencer  (npi)
** to  &3 file later  / 2. a, b, c, d. / 3.